PROP NAVI

COMPARE

FundedNext vs FundingPips: Full Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of FundedNext and FundingPips built from our normalised 31-firm dataset. Every figure was read off the firms’ own pages, and each row carries its source and check date. Where we could not verify something we mark it “not verified” rather than leaving it blank.

Key findings

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $59.99).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 95%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Min trading days (3 days vs 5 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 14 days).
  • FundedNext comes out ahead on Payout processing time (1 days vs 3 days).

Terms compared

Item FundedNext FundingPips
Evaluation model Multiple models Multiple models
Lowest entry fee $59.99 $29 Better
Max profit split 95% 100% Better
Profit target 8% 8%
Daily loss limit 5% 5%
Max drawdown 10% 10%
Drawdown type Mixed Mixed
Min trading days 5 days 3 days Better
Payout cycle 14 days 5 days Better
Payout processing time 1 days Better 3 days
Max leverage Not verified 1:100
Account sizes $6,000 / $15,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000 $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000
Asset classes forex, indices, commodities, crypto, futures forex, indices, crypto, commodities
Trustpilot 4.5 (76,502) 4.5 (66,155)
Third-party payout verification Third-party verified Third-party verified
Recorded rule changes None recorded None recorded

FundedNext: Read the review FundingPips: Read the review

How the drawdown works

Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.

Third-party payout verification

FundedNext

$336.1M+ — Third-party verified

The claim is not stable: the live page counts up to $336.1M+, while the server-rendered HTML for the same URL on the same day carries two different fallback values, $306.9M+ and $316.1M+, both labelled "Total Rewarded". The gap to the on-chain figure is not itself evidence of overstatement — the firm may also pay off-chain — but no fixed claimed number exists to compare against.

FundedNext — homepage ("Total Rewarded" counter) · 2026-08-05

FundingPips

$288M+ — Third-party verified

No "as of" date, no auditor, and no methodology anywhere near the figure. fundingpips.com returns HTTP 429 behind a Vercel security checkpoint to automated fetches; the claim was read in a browser.

FundingPips — homepage ("$288M+ Total Rewards") · 2026-08-05

→

Recorded rule changes

FundedNext

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundedNext. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

FundingPips

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundingPips. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

→

Which one fits you

What the data says, priority by priority. The decision is yours; we do not give investment advice.

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $59.99).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 95%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Min trading days (3 days vs 5 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 14 days).
  • FundedNext comes out ahead on Payout processing time (1 days vs 3 days).

FAQ

Which is cheaper to start, FundedNext or FundingPips?
FundedNext is $59.99 and FundingPips is $29, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Lowest entry fee. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one pays the higher profit split?
FundedNext is 95% and FundingPips is 100%, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Max profit split. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one has the shorter payout cycle?
FundedNext is 14 days and FundingPips is 5 days, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Payout cycle. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Do they calculate drawdown the same way?
Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.
What do their Trustpilot ratings look like?
FundedNext: 4.5 (76,502). FundingPips: 4.5 (66,155). Profiles were checked on 2026-07-31. Where Trustpilot has withheld a rating for a guideline breach we publish no score.

Sources

Data currency

Terms data 2026-06-22 / payout verification 2026-08-05 / rule changes 2026-08-22. Prop firm terms change without notice — always confirm on the official site before you buy.

This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.

Related comparisons