PROP NAVI

COMPARE

FundingPips vs Apex Trader Funding: Full Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of FundingPips and Apex Trader Funding built from our normalised 31-firm dataset. Every figure was read off the firms’ own pages, and each row carries its source and check date. Where we could not verify something we mark it “not verified” rather than leaving it blank.

Key findings

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $177).
  • Apex Trader Funding comes out ahead on Profit target (6% vs 8%).
  • Apex Trader Funding comes out ahead on Min trading days (0 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 8 days).
  • Apex Trader Funding comes out ahead on Payout processing time (2 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips holds the higher Trustpilot rating (4.5 (66,155) vs 4.2 (20,407)).

Terms compared

Item FundingPips Apex Trader Funding
Evaluation model Multiple models 1-step
Lowest entry fee $29 Better $177
Max profit split 100% 100%
Profit target 8% 6% Better
Daily loss limit The two firms calculate drawdown differently, so the percentages are not directly comparable. 5% 2%
Max drawdown The two firms calculate drawdown differently, so the percentages are not directly comparable. 10% 4%
Drawdown type Mixed End-of-day trailing
Min trading days 3 days 0 days Better
Payout cycle 5 days Better 8 days
Payout processing time 3 days 2 days Better
Max leverage 1:100 Not verified
Account sizes $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $150,000
Asset classes forex, indices, crypto, commodities futures
Trustpilot 4.5 (66,155) Better 4.2 (20,407)
Third-party payout verification Third-party verified Self-reported only
Recorded rule changes None recorded 1

FundingPips: Read the review Apex Trader Funding: Read the review

How the drawdown works

FundingPips uses a mixed drawdown while Apex Trader Funding uses a end-of-day trailing one. This is one of the most common reasons an account fails: with a trailing drawdown the limit rises with your open profit, so the same headline percentage leaves less real room.

Third-party payout verification

FundingPips

$288M+ — Third-party verified

No "as of" date, no auditor, and no methodology anywhere near the figure. fundingpips.com returns HTTP 429 behind a Vercel security checkpoint to automated fetches; the claim was read in a browser.

FundingPips — homepage ("$288M+ Total Rewards") · 2026-08-05

Apex Trader Funding

833.87M — Self-reported only

Three live counters, none carrying a currency symbol as rendered — the figure displays as bare "833.87M". Wording is "Compensation to Customers", not payouts, and the homepage separately claims "No Payout Denials". apextraderfunding.com returns HTTP 403 to automated fetches; the values were read from the counters’ data attributes in a browser on the check date and will have moved since. Payouts go by ACH in the US and through the payment partner Plane internationally, so no public settlement record exists; Apex is not among the firms Payout Junction tracks.

Apex Trader Funding — homepage counters ("Total Compensation to Customers Since 2022") · 2026-08-05

→

Recorded rule changes

FundingPips

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundingPips. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

Apex Trader Funding

  • Effective 2026-03-01 Before: Performance Accounts paying 100% of the first $25,000 then 90/10, on an 8-day payout cycle with a 30% consistency rule. → After: EOD and Intraday Performance Accounts: 100% split, $500 minimum, 5 qualifying days, 50% consistency rule, and a maximum of 6 payouts after which the account closes. Apex Trader Funding Support — Legacy Products Overview

→

Which one fits you

What the data says, priority by priority. The decision is yours; we do not give investment advice.

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $177).
  • Apex Trader Funding comes out ahead on Profit target (6% vs 8%).
  • Apex Trader Funding comes out ahead on Min trading days (0 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 8 days).
  • Apex Trader Funding comes out ahead on Payout processing time (2 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips holds the higher Trustpilot rating (4.5 (66,155) vs 4.2 (20,407)).

FAQ

Which is cheaper to start, FundingPips or Apex Trader Funding?
FundingPips is $29 and Apex Trader Funding is $177, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Lowest entry fee. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one pays the higher profit split?
FundingPips is 100% and Apex Trader Funding is 100%.
Which one has the shorter payout cycle?
FundingPips is 5 days and Apex Trader Funding is 8 days, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Payout cycle. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Do they calculate drawdown the same way?
FundingPips uses a mixed drawdown while Apex Trader Funding uses a end-of-day trailing one. This is one of the most common reasons an account fails: with a trailing drawdown the limit rises with your open profit, so the same headline percentage leaves less real room.
What do their Trustpilot ratings look like?
FundingPips: 4.5 (66,155). Apex Trader Funding: 4.2 (20,407). Profiles were checked on 2026-07-31. Where Trustpilot has withheld a rating for a guideline breach we publish no score.

Sources

Data currency

Terms data 2026-06-22 / payout verification 2026-08-05 / rule changes 2026-08-22. Prop firm terms change without notice — always confirm on the official site before you buy.

This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.

Related comparisons