COMPARE
FundingPips vs Funded Trading Plus: Full Comparison
A side-by-side comparison of FundingPips and Funded Trading Plus built from our normalised 31-firm dataset. Every figure was read off the firms’ own pages, and each row carries its source and check date. Where we could not verify something we mark it “not verified” rather than leaving it blank.
Key findings
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $119).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Profit target (8% vs 10%).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Daily loss limit (5% vs 4%).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 6%).
- Funded Trading Plus comes out ahead on Min trading days (0 days vs 3 days).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 7 days).
Terms compared
| Item | FundingPips | Funded Trading Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation model | Multiple models | Multiple models |
| Lowest entry fee | $29 Better | $119 |
| Max profit split | 100% | 100% |
| Profit target | 8% Better | 10% |
| Daily loss limit | 5% Better | 4% |
| Max drawdown | 10% Better | 6% |
| Drawdown type | Mixed | Mixed |
| Min trading days | 3 days | 0 days Better |
| Payout cycle | 5 days Better | 7 days |
| Payout processing time | 3 days | 2 days Better |
| Max leverage | 1:100 | 1:30 |
| Account sizes | $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 | $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000 |
| Asset classes | forex, indices, crypto, commodities | forex, indices, crypto, commodities |
| Trustpilot | 4.5 (66,155) | Rating withheld for a guideline breach |
| Third-party payout verification | Third-party verified | Self-reported only |
| Recorded rule changes | None recorded | None recorded |
FundingPips: Read the review Funded Trading Plus: Read the review
How the drawdown works
Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.
Third-party payout verification
FundingPips
$288M+ — Third-party verified
No "as of" date, no auditor, and no methodology anywhere near the figure. fundingpips.com returns HTTP 429 behind a Vercel security checkpoint to automated fetches; the claim was read in a browser.
FundingPips — homepage ("$288M+ Total Rewards") · 2026-08-05
Funded Trading Plus
$19.5M+ — Self-reported only
The same number is labelled three ways on the same site: "Total Trader Rewards", "19.5M+ Real Rewards" in the page title, and "$19.5M+ IN SIMULATED REWARDS" under a heading reading "VERIFIED REWARDS". The "Verified" label attaches to individual reward entries and is self-asserted; no auditor is named. fundedtradingplus.com returns HTTP 403 to automated fetches; read in a browser. Not among the firms Payout Junction tracks.
Funded Trading Plus — homepage ("$19.5M+ Total Trader Rewards, 2021 – 2026") · 2026-08-05
Recorded rule changes
FundingPips
Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundingPips. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.
Funded Trading Plus
Our tracker holds no recorded changes for Funded Trading Plus. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.
Which one fits you
What the data says, priority by priority. The decision is yours; we do not give investment advice.
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $119).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Profit target (8% vs 10%).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Daily loss limit (5% vs 4%).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 6%).
- Funded Trading Plus comes out ahead on Min trading days (0 days vs 3 days).
- FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 7 days).
- Funded Trading Plus comes out ahead on Payout processing time (2 days vs 3 days).
FAQ
- Which is cheaper to start, FundingPips or Funded Trading Plus?
- FundingPips is $29 and Funded Trading Plus is $119, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Lowest entry fee. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
- Which one pays the higher profit split?
- FundingPips is 100% and Funded Trading Plus is 100%.
- Which one has the shorter payout cycle?
- FundingPips is 5 days and Funded Trading Plus is 7 days, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Payout cycle. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
- Do they calculate drawdown the same way?
- Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.
- What do their Trustpilot ratings look like?
- FundingPips: 4.5 (66,155). Funded Trading Plus: Rating withheld for a guideline breach. Profiles were checked on 2026-07-31. Where Trustpilot has withheld a rating for a guideline breach we publish no score.
Sources
- https://fundingpips.com/
- https://fundingpips.com/trading-objectives
- https://www.fxempire.com/prop-firms/fundingpips
- https://proptradingvibes.com/blog/fundingpips-rules
- https://newyorkcityservers.com/blog/fundingpips-review
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/fundingpips.com
- https://www.fundedtradingplus.com/
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/fundedtradingplus.com
- https://www.fxempire.com/prop-firms/fundedtradingplus
- https://fortunly.com/reviews/funded-trading-plus-review/
- https://coincodecap.com/funded-trading-plus-review
Data currency
Terms data 2026-06-22 / payout verification 2026-08-05 / rule changes 2026-08-22. Prop firm terms change without notice — always confirm on the official site before you buy.
This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.