COMPARE

FundingPips vs Hola Prime: Full Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of FundingPips and Hola Prime built from our normalised 31-firm dataset. Every figure was read off the firms’ own pages, and each row carries its source and check date. Where we could not verify something we mark it “not verified” rather than leaving it blank.

Key findings

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $48).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 95%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 8%).
  • Hola Prime comes out ahead on Min trading days (2 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 14 days).
  • Hola Prime comes out ahead on Payout processing time (1 days vs 3 days).

Terms compared

Item FundingPips Hola Prime
Evaluation model Multiple models Multiple models
Lowest entry fee $29 Better $48
Max profit split 100% Better 95%
Profit target 8% 8%
Daily loss limit 5% 5%
Max drawdown 10% Better 8%
Drawdown type Mixed Mixed
Min trading days 3 days 2 days Better
Payout cycle 5 days Better 14 days
Payout processing time 3 days 1 days Better
Max leverage 1:100 1:100
Account sizes $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000 / $300,000
Asset classes forex, indices, crypto, commodities forex, crypto, indices, commodities
Trustpilot 4.5 (66,155) 4.5 (3,366)
Third-party payout verification Third-party verified Not verified
Recorded rule changes None recorded None recorded

How the drawdown works

Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.

Third-party payout verification

FundingPips

$288M+ — Third-party verified

No "as of" date, no auditor, and no methodology anywhere near the figure. fundingpips.com returns HTTP 429 behind a Vercel security checkpoint to automated fetches; the claim was read in a browser.

FundingPips — homepage ("$288M+ Total Rewards") · 2026-08-05

Hola Prime

98.35% of payouts within one hour, zero denials (2026-03-15) —

The only engagement by a named professional firm anywhere in this set — and it is a review, not an audit. Scope matters in three ways. It covers a five-month window that closed on 2026-03-15, not current performance. It covers only traders who had completed an evaluation and been pre-approved for a payout, not the whole trader base. And the report itself is not public: Finance Magnates, which established that scope limit, reported it as exclusively seen (https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/analysis/hola-prime-brings-in-deloitte-to-audit-payouts-as-trust-gap-widens-across-prop-firms/), so no reader can inspect the engagement letter or its limitations. The firm reports about $3.2M distributed in the window at an average of roughly $4,500 and an average payout time of about 33 minutes 48 seconds; those figures are the firm’s, not Deloitte’s. Speed and denial rate are not the same measurement as cumulative volume, and Hola Prime publishes no cumulative payout total — the amount in the verified column is on-chain settlement read by Payout Junction, which is a different measurement again.

Hola Prime — "Deloitte Review Confirms Hola Prime’s 1-Hour Payouts and Zero Denials" · 2026-08-05

Recorded rule changes

FundingPips

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundingPips. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

Hola Prime

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for Hola Prime. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

Which one fits you

What the data says, priority by priority. The decision is yours; we do not give investment advice.

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $48).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 95%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 8%).
  • Hola Prime comes out ahead on Min trading days (2 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 14 days).
  • Hola Prime comes out ahead on Payout processing time (1 days vs 3 days).

FAQ

Which is cheaper to start, FundingPips or Hola Prime?
FundingPips is $29 and Hola Prime is $48, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Lowest entry fee. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one pays the higher profit split?
FundingPips is 100% and Hola Prime is 95%, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Max profit split. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one has the shorter payout cycle?
FundingPips is 5 days and Hola Prime is 14 days, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Payout cycle. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Do they calculate drawdown the same way?
Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.
What do their Trustpilot ratings look like?
FundingPips: 4.5 (66,155). Hola Prime: 4.5 (3,366). Profiles were checked on 2026-07-31. Where Trustpilot has withheld a rating for a guideline breach we publish no score.

Sources

Data currency

Terms data 2026-06-22 / payout verification 2026-08-05 / rule changes 2026-08-22. Prop firm terms change without notice — always confirm on the official site before you buy.

This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.

Related comparisons