PROP NAVI

COMPARE

FundingPips vs Maven Trading: Full Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of FundingPips and Maven Trading built from our normalised 31-firm dataset. Every figure was read off the firms’ own pages, and each row carries its source and check date. Where we could not verify something we mark it “not verified” rather than leaving it blank.

Key findings

  • Maven Trading comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($12 vs $29).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 80%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Daily loss limit (5% vs 4%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 8%).
  • Maven Trading comes out ahead on Min trading days (0 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 14 days).

Terms compared

Item FundingPips Maven Trading
Evaluation model Multiple models Multiple models
Lowest entry fee $29 $12 Better
Max profit split 100% Better 80%
Profit target 8% 8%
Daily loss limit 5% Better 4%
Max drawdown 10% Better 8%
Drawdown type Mixed Mixed
Min trading days 3 days 0 days Better
Payout cycle 5 days Better 14 days
Payout processing time 3 days 2 days Better
Max leverage 1:100 1:75
Account sizes $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 $2,000 / $5,000 / $10,000 / $20,000 / $50,000 / $100,000
Asset classes forex, indices, crypto, commodities forex, commodities, indices, crypto
Trustpilot 4.5 (66,155) Rating withheld for a guideline breach
Third-party payout verification Third-party verified Self-reported only
Recorded rule changes None recorded None recorded

FundingPips: Read the review Maven Trading: Read the review

How the drawdown works

Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.

Third-party payout verification

FundingPips

$288M+ — Third-party verified

No "as of" date, no auditor, and no methodology anywhere near the figure. fundingpips.com returns HTTP 429 behind a Vercel security checkpoint to automated fetches; the claim was read in a browser.

FundingPips — homepage ("$288M+ Total Rewards") · 2026-08-05

Maven Trading

$1 million paid to traders in 2023 (2023-12-31) — Self-reported only

The homepage publishes no cumulative payout figure. Its stat bar reads "$62k+ Highest total payout" and "$200M+ Total funding" — the first is one trader’s best result and the second is simulated capital allocated, and neither should be read as money paid to traders. The only payout amount on the site is the blog line "a model that paid out $1 million to our traders in 2023 alone". Not among the firms Payout Junction tracks.

Maven Trading blog — Forex trading account managers ("paid out $1 million to our traders in 2023 alone") · 2026-08-05

→

Recorded rule changes

FundingPips

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundingPips. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

Maven Trading

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for Maven Trading. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

→

Which one fits you

What the data says, priority by priority. The decision is yours; we do not give investment advice.

  • Maven Trading comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($12 vs $29).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 80%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Daily loss limit (5% vs 4%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 8%).
  • Maven Trading comes out ahead on Min trading days (0 days vs 3 days).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Payout cycle (5 days vs 14 days).
  • Maven Trading comes out ahead on Payout processing time (2 days vs 3 days).

FAQ

Which is cheaper to start, FundingPips or Maven Trading?
FundingPips is $29 and Maven Trading is $12, so Maven Trading is the better of the two on Lowest entry fee. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one pays the higher profit split?
FundingPips is 100% and Maven Trading is 80%, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Max profit split. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one has the shorter payout cycle?
FundingPips is 5 days and Maven Trading is 14 days, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Payout cycle. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Do they calculate drawdown the same way?
Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.
What do their Trustpilot ratings look like?
FundingPips: 4.5 (66,155). Maven Trading: Rating withheld for a guideline breach. Profiles were checked on 2026-07-31. Where Trustpilot has withheld a rating for a guideline breach we publish no score.

Sources

Data currency

Terms data 2026-06-22 / payout verification 2026-08-05 / rule changes 2026-08-22. Prop firm terms change without notice — always confirm on the official site before you buy.

This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.

Related comparisons