PROP NAVI

COMPARE

FundingPips vs TradeDay: Full Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of FundingPips and TradeDay built from our normalised 31-firm dataset. Every figure was read off the firms’ own pages, and each row carries its source and check date. Where we could not verify something we mark it “not verified” rather than leaving it blank.

Key findings

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $59).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 90%).
  • TradeDay comes out ahead on Profit target (6% vs 8%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 4%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Min trading days (3 days vs 5 days).
  • TradeDay comes out ahead on Payout cycle (0 days vs 5 days).

Terms compared

Item FundingPips TradeDay
Evaluation model Multiple models 1-step
Lowest entry fee $29 Better $59
Max profit split 100% Better 90%
Profit target 8% 6% Better
Daily loss limit 5% None
Max drawdown 10% Better 4%
Drawdown type Mixed Mixed
Min trading days 3 days Better 5 days
Payout cycle 5 days 0 days Better
Payout processing time 3 days 1 days Better
Max leverage 1:100 Not verified
Account sizes $5,000 / $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 $50,000 / $100,000 / $150,000
Asset classes forex, indices, crypto, commodities futures
Trustpilot 4.5 (66,155) 4.6 (1,417) Better
Third-party payout verification Third-party verified Third-party verified
Recorded rule changes None recorded 3

FundingPips: Read the review TradeDay: Read the review

How the drawdown works

Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.

Third-party payout verification

FundingPips

$288M+ — Third-party verified

No "as of" date, no auditor, and no methodology anywhere near the figure. fundingpips.com returns HTTP 429 behind a Vercel security checkpoint to automated fetches; the claim was read in a browser.

FundingPips — homepage ("$288M+ Total Rewards") · 2026-08-05

TradeDay

$10M+ — Third-party verified

The only firm in this set whose independently checkable figure exceeds its own claim. Payout Junction reads $13,394,795 across 11,681 on-chain settlements, most recent 2026-08-04 18:59 UTC, against a homepage claim of "$10M+". Largest single settlement $49,277 (2025-09-12), average $1,147. TradeDay does not cite the tracker.

TradeDay — homepage ("Over $10 million in Verified Payouts") · 2026-08-05

→

Recorded rule changes

FundingPips

Our tracker holds no recorded changes for FundingPips. An absence of records is not proof that nothing changed.

TradeDay

  • Observed 2026-08-20 Before: Aggregators and our own earlier reading described the split as up to 90%, and the cheapest 50K plan as roughly $62.50/mo under a 50% sale. → After: The live homepage on 2026-08-20 states a staged split — 50/50 below $4,000 net profit, 80/20 above $4,000, and 90/10 only in Funded Live — and prices the 50K Intraday Quick Pay at $59/mo (list $131) with an End-of-Day variant at $79/mo (list $175), under a banner reading 55% OFF. A public promo code TDNEW is displayed site-wide with no stated discount value. TradeDay — homepage plan cards and funded-stage rules
  • Effective 2026-07-26 Before: Funded Sim accounts had no consistency objective. Payout caps were $2,000 on a 50K, $2,500 on a 100K and $3,000 on a 150K. → After: A 45% consistency objective applies — no single day may make up more than 45% of total gross profits — and payout caps fall to $1,500 on a 50K, $1,850 on a 100K and $2,250 on a 150K. TradeDay Knowledge Base — Fast Pass Funded Sim Payout Policy
  • Effective 2026-05-29 Before: Nine account SKUs across Static, EOD and Intraday types. → After: Two evaluation routes — Quick Pay and Fast Pass — with entry from $62.50 on a 50K account. TradeDay — TradeDay 2.0: The Next Evolution of Prop Trading (29 May 2026)

→

Which one fits you

What the data says, priority by priority. The decision is yours; we do not give investment advice.

  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Lowest entry fee ($29 vs $59).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max profit split (100% vs 90%).
  • TradeDay comes out ahead on Profit target (6% vs 8%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Max drawdown (10% vs 4%).
  • FundingPips comes out ahead on Min trading days (3 days vs 5 days).
  • TradeDay comes out ahead on Payout cycle (0 days vs 5 days).
  • TradeDay comes out ahead on Payout processing time (1 days vs 3 days).
  • TradeDay holds the higher Trustpilot rating (4.6 (1,417) vs 4.5 (66,155)).

Check current terms on the official sites

TradeDay 公式で詳細を見る

FAQ

Which is cheaper to start, FundingPips or TradeDay?
FundingPips is $29 and TradeDay is $59, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Lowest entry fee. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one pays the higher profit split?
FundingPips is 100% and TradeDay is 90%, so FundingPips is the better of the two on Max profit split. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Which one has the shorter payout cycle?
FundingPips is 5 days and TradeDay is 0 days, so TradeDay is the better of the two on Payout cycle. This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.
Do they calculate drawdown the same way?
Both firms use a mixed drawdown, so open profit affects your loss allowance the same way at each.
What do their Trustpilot ratings look like?
FundingPips: 4.5 (66,155). TradeDay: 4.6 (1,417). Profiles were checked on 2026-07-31. Where Trustpilot has withheld a rating for a guideline breach we publish no score.

Sources

Data currency

Terms data 2026-06-22 / payout verification 2026-08-05 / rule changes 2026-08-22. Prop firm terms change without notice — always confirm on the official site before you buy.

This page is an informational comparison, not investment advice. Passing an evaluation is not guaranteed and entry fees may not be refundable.

Related comparisons